it is not appropriate. hell, half the time you can't curse in game chat. and if you do, it's bleeped out. the same rule should apply for names. i have children, and they watch me play games. now i'm not so comfortable with it.
i never explicitly said i'd agree with max. i even indicated that i wanted to see the rest of the chat. either way, i know i have been threatened to be banned for a strange reason before, and i didn't report it. i didn't feel the need. because of my situation, i can see that max could be telling ...
and this is somewhat off topic, but James threatened to ban me because I put a callout in social. so i didn't put another callout out there, but i wanted to see why i would get banned because of it. so i started talking to him about the rule. we were discussing the rule, and he threatened to ban me ...
motionshop, the only reason you're agreeing with you is, like the entire thread, max is lying.
Let the admins deal with this; James has ALWAYS dealth fairly with people, and you can ask any mod for the Live Chat about max and his many, MANY bans. This whole incident where James "abused his power ...
i never explicitly said i'd agree with max. i even indicated that i wanted to see the rest of the chat. either way, i know i have been threatened to be banned for a strange reason before, and i didn't report it. i didn't feel the need. because of my situation, i can see that max could be telling the ...
if they knew each other in real life, were they communicating about the game? or something else?
who knows. i'd be suspicious, but it doesn't seem like there is enough evidence. keep an eye out on them. i think that's all you can do with what information is available.
and you got banned because of it? i don't understand. are there chat room rules? i was under the impression it had similar guidelines as forum rules: no racism/prejudice/bigotry/sexism and the like.
i know i've been threatened to be banned for posting a callout in the social section. i thought that ...
it's pretty clear it's a case of secret diplomacy. it was declared in the game chat.
the accused indicated that he/she was unaware of the rules. I don't see how a player doens't know the rules. You are bombarded with the rules when you first sign up. I assume so issues like this don't ...
from the original report, it looks like vazquez did abuse his power. but i don't see enough evidence. i wish i could see more of the dialogue prior to that part of it. i haven't read through the entire thread, so there may be plenty i'm missing. but from what i did read, it looked like people were ...
it's true. without the pm there is no evidence. all you can do, right now, at least, is foe's list. if you're interested. or go to flame wars. i think you can do that.
no offence bep, but it's not pm abuse. you continued to respond. so did he. if you didn't want to communicate, you should have stopped communicating. if, then, he continued to barrage your inbox with pm's, i'd have an issue with it. not just one or two messages, i mean spam. 20 or thirty.
sorry kemmler, what you did is cheap and wrong. even if he was a multi in the end, you have no right to demand any player, multi or not, to sacrifice his points. he's innocent until proven guilty. that's how it works in most parts of the world, and that's how it works here.
well, it's sad he won't post the original message. all it shows is something of his character. as for Herpes, i've already talked to several people who have foe's listed him for his abuse.
second, noone is asking you to do dirty work. we are asking you to copy and paste what you said you would copy and paste. if copying and pasting is dirty work, i don't know what to tell you.
third, how can you possibly find it suspicious that nobody else has reported ...
i'm sorry, but you need to quote the private message. this sort of abuse is not acceptable. there are several other players who are getting duped into joining games they had no intention of joining, and you're going to just sit there?
come on. have a bit of integrity, here. show the colors. you ...
no. that's not secret diplomacy. you might want to consider thoroughly discussing the accused's tactics in the game chat prior to accusing them of doing any harm on a forum. i wouldn't consider it secret diplomacy under any circumstances. They are/were still attacking one another, and they are/were ...