Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Fixed linksafoley wrote:Accused:
ETPsych
The accused is suspected of:
Other: <Explanation> In a good number of the games in which ETPsych is about to lose, they deadbeat and intentionaly miss turns. This can be seen--along with abusive remarks about ET's opponents' dice rolls, validity in their wins, and overall win percentage-- in the following games:
Game number(s):
Game 7088202
Game 7087383
Game 7077475
Game 7077343
Game 7077122
Game 7066671
Game 7065673
Game 7064735
Game 7062268
Game 7062218
Comments: In the game 7088202, ETPsych even indicates his "deadbeat" strategy, telling me to enjoy the wait, even though we had been playing real time up until that point. This isn't as big of a deal to premiums, but it is to me as a fremium when i only get 4 games at a time, which is probably why I am the first to point this out.
Good luck hunting,
afoley
Holding him hostage would be prolonging a game by not eliminating him. Did they agree to play RT?eddie2 wrote:also because this guy is freemium would it not come under holding hostage as well. because he is stopping him from playing other games.

Evil Semp wrote:Going to look into this.
Holding him hostage would be prolonging a game by not eliminating him. Did they agree to play RT?eddie2 wrote:also because this guy is freemium would it not come under holding hostage as well. because he is stopping him from playing other games.
No it would not be considered holding him hostage.eddie2 wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Going to look into this.
Holding him hostage would be prolonging a game by not eliminating him. Did they agree to play RT?eddie2 wrote:also because this guy is freemium would it not come under holding hostage as well. because he is stopping him from playing other games.
no but a premium not playing because he was losing against a freemium would this not class as holding hostage what he said in the game as well
enjoy the wait
at the end im not sure might or might not also looks like he has started to play it again after this was posted

ok thank youEvil Semp wrote:No it would not be considered holding him hostage.eddie2 wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Going to look into this.
Holding him hostage would be prolonging a game by not eliminating him. Did they agree to play RT?eddie2 wrote:also because this guy is freemium would it not come under holding hostage as well. because he is stopping him from playing other games.
no but a premium not playing because he was losing against a freemium would this not class as holding hostage what he said in the game as well
enjoy the wait
at the end im not sure might or might not also looks like he has started to play it again after this was posted
No no no my good friendgcwca_4_life wrote:Rate him accordingly, and foe him. Only thing that can be done.
Besides, that's all sore losers like this deserve..