Moderator: Community Team
I agree with this as well. I wouldn't try to judge an entire group by one extremist group. The real test is, do the greater majority support, defend, and listen to them. I haven't heard anyone here defending this junk. The nice thing about freedom of speech is you can see how stupid these little groups really are before they gain any real force behind them.Balsiefen wrote:Very true but al quida (sp?) are idiots who are not simular to 99.99% of other muslimsGuilty_Biscuit wrote:I'd just like to say that these idiots are not similar to 99.99% of other christians.Anarchist wrote:Figures the Jesus freaks would rush to defend them.
How many innocent people has america killed? Isnt this government run by similar christians?
War is wrong. Dont try to give excuses for murder
Their site has a bunch of images of American flags being flown upside down, and there's a load of British flags upside down on that essay someone just posted regarding Britain. It's seems to be a 'thing' for them. Don't know its relevance though.2dimes wrote:I did not watch and don't know if the guy is savvy to this but...Stopper wrote:EDIT: What's with the man flying the upside-down Canadian flag in the background?
Flying your own flag upside down was a signal of distress for the Canadian Military.
100 people vs the entirety of america wouldn't be much of a violent takeover. Even WBC aren't that stupid.spurgistan wrote:Yeah, it's kinda worth noting that nobody calls these jobs "Christian" except for themselves. Kinda like I would assume (don't know) that normal adherants to Islam don't call their whackos "Muslims", but take care to differentiate themselves. But re the "Why aren't we bombing Westoboro" question, seeing as these guys aren't much threat to anybody but themselves... if they attempted a violent takeover of the United States then of course, bomb 'em to oblivion, but these guys are harmless as long as we ignore them.
Well yeah, that was just sort of pointing out the main difference between these nutjobs and Al-Qaeda nutjobs, which is that these guys don't pose a threat, while Al-Qaeda (to degrees) does.Primate wrote:100 people vs the entirety of america wouldn't be much of a violent takeover. Even WBC aren't that stupid.spurgistan wrote:Yeah, it's kinda worth noting that nobody calls these jobs "Christian" except for themselves. Kinda like I would assume (don't know) that normal adherants to Islam don't call their whackos "Muslims", but take care to differentiate themselves. But re the "Why aren't we bombing Westoboro" question, seeing as these guys aren't much threat to anybody but themselves... if they attempted a violent takeover of the United States then of course, bomb 'em to oblivion, but these guys are harmless as long as we ignore them.
Doesn't mean that slamming them over the head with weighted snow shovels would be a negative thing.spurgistan wrote:Well yeah, that was just sort of pointing out the main difference between these nutjobs and Al-Qaeda nutjobs, which is that these guys don't pose a threat, while Al-Qaeda (to degrees) does.Primate wrote:100 people vs the entirety of america wouldn't be much of a violent takeover. Even WBC aren't that stupid.spurgistan wrote:Yeah, it's kinda worth noting that nobody calls these jobs "Christian" except for themselves. Kinda like I would assume (don't know) that normal adherants to Islam don't call their whackos "Muslims", but take care to differentiate themselves. But re the "Why aren't we bombing Westoboro" question, seeing as these guys aren't much threat to anybody but themselves... if they attempted a violent takeover of the United States then of course, bomb 'em to oblivion, but these guys are harmless as long as we ignore them.
Primate wrote:100 people vs the entirety of america wouldn't be much of a violent takeover. Even WBC aren't that stupid.spurgistan wrote:Yeah, it's kinda worth noting that nobody calls these jobs "Christian" except for themselves. Kinda like I would assume (don't know) that normal adherants to Islam don't call their whackos "Muslims", but take care to differentiate themselves. But re the "Why aren't we bombing Westoboro" question, seeing as these guys aren't much threat to anybody but themselves... if they attempted a violent takeover of the United States then of course, bomb 'em to oblivion, but these guys are harmless as long as we ignore them.
Nephilim wrote:wow, check the wiki article on them, i'm sure some of it is disputable, but still.....
the scary thing for me is this: they contend that political or social allowance of homosexuality (i'm speaking loosely here) is to blam for almost all disasters or large-scale negative human events like war. how horrific is it that mainstream conservative christian leaders in the states aren't too far away from this? i think i remember jerry falwell saying that 9/11 was god's punishment on the US for abortion or homosexuality, and pat robertson saying the same types of things about the tsunami.
just another instance of deranged but too goddamn influential folks claiming god as a force for their agenda. it's like crazy, large-scale psychic projection: it makes me wonder if mr. phelps and his kin have some raging homos among their own numbers. why else would they be so obsessed w/ persecuting people?
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Which Jesus Freak defended their actions? What they did was wrong, disgraceful, and totally inconsiderate.Anarchist wrote:Figures the Jesus freaks would rush to defend them.
LotsAnarchist wrote:How many innocent people has america killed?
NoAnarchist wrote:Isnt this government run by similar christians?
not true...it is sometimes necessary in order to stop wackos like Adolf Hitler.Anarchist wrote:War is wrong.
Don't try to equate an evil regime bent on the destruction of the United States & Israel with people who are deranged. There's a difference between taking physical action against innocent people and spouting nonsense with silly parodies.Anarchist wrote:Dont try to give excuses for murder
well, if you believe in a just god, which i assume you do, then you may want to condemn views that attribute mass deaths to god's hatred of any particular sin, or even a swath of sins. see, there are ostensibly plenty of folks killed in those incidents that did not endorse homosexuality, abortion, war, etc. yes, to talk in absolutes about such things might be silly, b/c an omnipotent god would presumably work in inscrutable ways. but leaving open the possibility of god's will in these events also allows him to be an unjust and hateful god.jay_a2j wrote:Nephilim wrote:wow, check the wiki article on them, i'm sure some of it is disputable, but still.....
the scary thing for me is this: they contend that political or social allowance of homosexuality (i'm speaking loosely here) is to blam for almost all disasters or large-scale negative human events like war. how horrific is it that mainstream conservative christian leaders in the states aren't too far away from this? i think i remember jerry falwell saying that 9/11 was god's punishment on the US for abortion or homosexuality, and pat robertson saying the same types of things about the tsunami.
just another instance of deranged but too goddamn influential folks claiming god as a force for their agenda. it's like crazy, large-scale psychic projection: it makes me wonder if mr. phelps and his kin have some raging homos among their own numbers. why else would they be so obsessed w/ persecuting people?
I don't know if 9/11, Katrina or the Tsunami were "God's" wrath, warning or wake up call. Could any of them be? Absolutely. Are they? I don't know but to say that they absolutely weren't or couldn't be is just silly. Or at least shows a poor knowledge of scripture.
Are you saying the United States is trying to systematically exterminate an entire race of people...that's what Hitler attempted to accomplish, amongst other things.diddle wrote:but wacko's like Adolf Hitler, were doing a lot worse things to humanity
Nephilim wrote:well, if you believe in a just god, which i assume you do, then you may want to condemn views that attribute mass deaths to god's hatred of any particular sin, or even a swath of sins. see, there are ostensibly plenty of folks killed in those incidents that did not endorse homosexuality, abortion, war, etc. yes, to talk in absolutes about such things might be silly, b/c an omnipotent god would presumably work in inscrutable ways. but leaving open the possibility of god's will in these events also allows him to be an unjust and hateful god.jay_a2j wrote:Nephilim wrote:wow, check the wiki article on them, i'm sure some of it is disputable, but still.....
the scary thing for me is this: they contend that political or social allowance of homosexuality (i'm speaking loosely here) is to blam for almost all disasters or large-scale negative human events like war. how horrific is it that mainstream conservative christian leaders in the states aren't too far away from this? i think i remember jerry falwell saying that 9/11 was god's punishment on the US for abortion or homosexuality, and pat robertson saying the same types of things about the tsunami.
just another instance of deranged but too goddamn influential folks claiming god as a force for their agenda. it's like crazy, large-scale psychic projection: it makes me wonder if mr. phelps and his kin have some raging homos among their own numbers. why else would they be so obsessed w/ persecuting people?
I don't know if 9/11, Katrina or the Tsunami were "God's" wrath, warning or wake up call. Could any of them be? Absolutely. Are they? I don't know but to say that they absolutely weren't or couldn't be is just silly. Or at least shows a poor knowledge of scripture.
in other words, the kind of god portrayed by westboro and their ilk. you are lining up with them, bud
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
And lest we forget, Hitler was actively trying to get rid of the Bible entirely and revive the old pagan beliefs of the German and Scandinavian peoples, due to the inherent semitic origin of scripture.luns101 wrote:Are you saying the United States is trying to systematically exterminate an entire race of people...that's what Hitler attempted to accomplish, amongst other things.diddle wrote:but wacko's like Adolf Hitler, were doing a lot worse things to humanity
Who are you referring to by "we"?
No he wasn't, he made it very clear in his speeches and his book that while he was using the Norse symbol for the sun (the swastika), it was not a return to the old ways.Jenos Ridan wrote:And lest we forget, Hitler was actively trying to get rid of the Bible entirely and revive the old pagan beliefs of the German and Scandinavian peoples, due to the inherent semitic origin of scripture.luns101 wrote:Are you saying the United States is trying to systematically exterminate an entire race of people...that's what Hitler attempted to accomplish, amongst other things.diddle wrote:but wacko's like Adolf Hitler, were doing a lot worse things to humanity
Who are you referring to by "we"?
As I understand it, Hitler was pretty much all about Hitler, and would use whatever he could to gain and keep power.vtmarik wrote:No he wasn't, he made it very clear in his speeches and his book that while he was using the Norse symbol for the sun (the swastika), it was not a return to the old ways.Jenos Ridan wrote:And lest we forget, Hitler was actively trying to get rid of the Bible entirely and revive the old pagan beliefs of the German and Scandinavian peoples, due to the inherent semitic origin of scripture.luns101 wrote:Are you saying the United States is trying to systematically exterminate an entire race of people...that's what Hitler attempted to accomplish, amongst other things.diddle wrote:but wacko's like Adolf Hitler, were doing a lot worse things to humanity
Who are you referring to by "we"?