
Moderator: Community Team
Sue Ann, on the left, is an average supporter of the so-called "State" of Israel. Hafizah over there on the right probably isn't.Bernie Sanders wrote:
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Hafiza could be hot, too, it's hard to tell with the hijab. It's like Aunt Jemima - no one looked at her twice until they took that rag off her head. Now I'm always getting a Breakfast Boner.jimboston wrote:One is hot?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
The burka is actually a great gender equalizer. Who needs to be hot when their face is covered by a big grill and their body by a nice, flowing robe? Islamic dress frees women from societal pressure to wear make up, be 'beach body ready', and generally starve and suffer just to please a man. It allows women to live a life without being viewed as a sex object.saxitoxin wrote:Hafiza could be hot, too, it's hard to tell with the hijab. It's like Aunt Jemima - no one looked at her twice until they took that rag off her head. Now I'm always getting a Breakfast Boner.jimboston wrote:One is hot?
Is asexuality your issue? Seek professional help, unless you don't mind.mrswdk wrote:The burka is actually a great gender equalizer. Who needs to be hot when their face is covered by a big grill and their body by a nice, flowing robe? Islamic dress frees women from societal pressure to wear make up, be 'beach body ready', and generally starve and suffer just to please a man. It allows women to live a life without being viewed as a sex object.saxitoxin wrote:Hafiza could be hot, too, it's hard to tell with the hijab. It's like Aunt Jemima - no one looked at her twice until they took that rag off her head. Now I'm always getting a Breakfast Boner.jimboston wrote:One is hot?
Hurray for Islamic egalitarianism, down with global patriarchy and its commodification of women's bodies!
Hate to say this, but I agree with that statement.mrswdk wrote:So then I guess the other difference is that the girl on the left is treated as random f*ck meat for all her football player acquaintances to blow their load into while she's passed out drunk on a front lawn somewhere, whereas the one on the right is treated as a respected comrade by her male peers.
Oh, i guess i get it now. Removing any hint of a woman's femininity means she'll finally be treated as an equal! Because as a man I'm completely incapable of treating a woman as more than a repository for my ejaculate. So i guess all those backwards fucks who slice off their daughter's and sister's genitalia are just looking to make them peers.Bernie Sanders wrote:Hate to say this, but I agree with that statement.mrswdk wrote:So then I guess the other difference is that the girl on the left is treated as random f*ck meat for all her football player acquaintances to blow their load into while she's passed out drunk on a front lawn somewhere, whereas the one on the right is treated as a respected comrade by her male peers.
Maybe some people don't consider looking sexy for TA1LGUNN3R and his friends to be a central element of their female identity.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:By suppressing what makes a female a woman so that she can be "treated as a respected peer," you therefore invalidate femininity.
Given that your whole argument (as much as there can be said to have been one in the first place) rested on the assumption that women who wear hijabs, niqabs or burkas do so because they are compelled to, I think you'll find that the fact plenty wear them out of choice negates your argument entirely.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Choice vs mandate. If a woman can choose to completely cover herself, that's fine, I don't really give a shit. That doesn't negate my argument.
Hm don't wear bed sheet or risk alienation from family and culture? Some decision.mrswdk wrote:Given that your whole argument (as much as there can be said to have been one in the first place) rested on the assumption that women who wear hijabs, niqabs or burkas do so because they are compelled to, I think you'll find that the fact plenty wear them out of choice negates your argument entirely.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Choice vs mandate. If a woman can choose to completely cover herself, that's fine, I don't really give a shit. That doesn't negate my argument.
The burka is not a tool of male oppression, it is a vehicle for female liberation. Put on a burka and you'll never be able to spend 10 hours walking around downtown NYC with rapists whistling and shouting 'ay mami' at you, intimidating you at every street corner. You're free to reclaim your identity as a person, rather than as a sex object.

Yeah yeah. It's part of their culture, therefore we can deduce they are all forced to wear one by their culture but all secretly hate it. Good job those females have a nice buff man like you to stand up and speak for them.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hm don't wear bed sheet or risk alienation from family and culture? Some decision.mrswdk wrote:Given that your whole argument (as much as there can be said to have been one in the first place) rested on the assumption that women who wear hijabs, niqabs or burkas do so because they are compelled to, I think you'll find that the fact plenty wear them out of choice negates your argument entirely.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Choice vs mandate. If a woman can choose to completely cover herself, that's fine, I don't really give a shit. That doesn't negate my argument.
The burka is not a tool of male oppression, it is a vehicle for female liberation. Put on a burka and you'll never be able to spend 10 hours walking around downtown NYC with rapists whistling and shouting 'ay mami' at you, intimidating you at every street corner. You're free to reclaim your identity as a person, rather than as a sex object.
My original point was that a burka is a good leveler because it eliminates treatment of women as if they are objects of sex, but thanks for once again putting words in my mouth.STR4WM4N wrote:Your original premise was that the white woman wearing the (pretty modest) tank top would be seen as objectified, or that the only way a man would be able to take her seriously was if the offending indications of her womanhood were removed from male sight. I often walk past women wearing similar garb, and amazingly I'm able to resist telling those bitches to go make me a sandwich. It's out there, I know.
I do what I can.mrs wrote:Good job those females have a nice buff man like you to stand up and speak for them.
Except that it doesn't. It actually reinforces a woman as an object of sex. Do men wear those kinds of dress? No. Only women wear them, and not even girls. Only women into the age of child-bearing wear them, and it tells anyone looking at them that they're a women of such, and therefore should not be looked at. It's defining something by its shadow rather than its outline.My original point was that a burka is a good leveler because it eliminates treatment of women as if they are objects of sex, but thanks for once again putting words in my mouth.
Whatever turns you on.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Except that it doesn't. It actually reinforces a woman as an object of sex.little miss wdk wrote:My original point was that a burka is a good leveler because it eliminates treatment of women as if they are objects of sex, but thanks for once again putting words in my mouth.
Do men wear those kinds of dress?
Maybe. Even little girls about 6/7 years old wear niqabs to school round my way though.No. Only women wear them, and not even girls.
Still better than getting lip smacks and wolf whistles.Only women into the age of child-bearing wear them, and it tells anyone looking at them that they're a women of such, and therefore should not be looked at. It's defining something by its shadow rather than its outline.
-TG
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.