Moderator: Community Team
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Those quotes seem to be bereft of context. In the first one he seems to be saying the term "religious dialogue" doesen't imply the same amount of intermingling he would like to see. IE rather than big functions between church big wigs, he would rather see intermingling of the faithful.GabonX wrote:In addition to the location of the WTC Mosque, the name itself "Cordoba House" is highly incendiary.
Cordoba is the city in southern Spain where Muslims built their first mosque at the start of their conquest of Spain to symbolize dominance. The famous "Great Mosque of Cordoba" was built over a Visigoth Church and it's no coincidence that the WTC Mosque is called "Cordoba House."
There's a kind of double speak ass-hattery going on here. In English the Imam behind Cordoba House is trumpeting lines of cultural exchange and tolerance, but in Arabic he's saying some very different things.
This, on websites that argue why Muslims should not sell property to Christians who want to build a church nonetheless.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
GabonX wrote:Do you really think that naming the WTC mosque after the Great Mosque of Cordoba, which was built to symbolize the Islamization of Spain, is a coincidence? This goes beyond stupid and enters the realm of willful ignorance...
Muslims are familiar with the history of Cordoba, and both the name and location of "Cordoba House" (the WTC Mosque) have been chosen to symbolize the expansion and supremacy of Islam over other cultures. This type of thing has been standard practice for the last 1300 years, and things are any different today.
As for this Imam, it's quite clear that he wants mainstream society to be openly accepting of Islam, but that he sees no need for Muslims to return that consideration. If he had a modicum of human decency he would have sought to put his mosque anywhere else than where it is because of how it could have been seen. Instead he preaches a message about tolerance to mainstream America while making no effort to return any kind of cultural sensitivity. He goes as far as to name his mosque after the symbol of the the Muslim conquest of Spain. It's not an accident.
Both the name and location of this mosque are insulting and deliberate. I take solace in the fact that when the World Trade Centers are rebuilt, that they will tower over this hateful and offensive little mosque.
This is your interpretation. You could apply the same analysis to other combinations of religions and city-names and reach similar conclusions. E.g., is any reference to the city of Rome necessarily a vindication of the supremacy and expansion of Christianity at the expense of the pre-Christian (Roman) civilisation?GabonX wrote:Muslims are familiar with the history of Cordoba, and both the name and location of "Cordoba House" (the WTC Mosque) have been chosen to symbolize the expansion and supremacy of Islam over other cultures.

Great analysis Night Strike.Night Strike wrote:Great analysis GabonX.
Great analysis InklOsed.InkL0sed wrote:Great analysis Night Strike.Night Strike wrote:Great analysis GabonX.

I don't know anything about it?tzor wrote:Great mutual mastribation and overall technical nit picking. But it doesn't bring back my dead neighbor.![]()
Nor does it bring back the Orthodox church that collapsed then the towers fell on it.
Nor does it bring back that priceless relic of St. Nicholas that was in that church.
Why aren't you all equally upset about a decision not to have a Mosque on Staten Island? Now I can see the outrage there. But no one is. Why?
Great analysis, InkL0sed.InkL0sed wrote:I don't know anything about it?tzor wrote:Great mutual mastribation and overall technical nit picking. But it doesn't bring back my dead neighbor.![]()
Nor does it bring back the Orthodox church that collapsed then the towers fell on it.
Nor does it bring back that priceless relic of St. Nicholas that was in that church.
Why aren't you all equally upset about a decision not to have a Mosque on Staten Island? Now I can see the outrage there. But no one is. Why?
Plus, my position is "I don't give a f*ck". I don't know why this story is in the media, so why should that one have been? This whole discussion is stupid.
PS. It's spelled "masturbation"
Yes, but it would be wrong to spell it right in this thread.InkL0sed wrote:PS. It's spelled "masturbation"

Great analysis, tzor.tzor wrote:Yes, but it would be wrong to spell it right in this thread.InkL0sed wrote:PS. It's spelled "masturbation"
oh, history...what a conceptGabonX wrote:In addition to the location of the WTC Mosque, the name itself "Cordoba House" is highly incendiary.
Cordoba is the city in southern Spain where Muslims built their first mosque at the start of their conquest of Spain to symbolize dominance. The famous "Great Mosque of Cordoba" was built over a Visigoth Church and it's no coincidence that the WTC Mosque is called "Cordoba House."
There's a kind of double speak ass-hattery going on here. In English the Imam behind Cordoba House is trumpeting lines of cultural exchange and tolerance, but in Arabic he's saying some very different things.
This, on websites that argue why Muslims should not sell property to Christians who want to build a church nonetheless.
Great analysis, history.Phatscotty wrote:oh, history...what a conceptGabonX wrote:In addition to the location of the WTC Mosque, the name itself "Cordoba House" is highly incendiary.
Cordoba is the city in southern Spain where Muslims built their first mosque at the start of their conquest of Spain to symbolize dominance. The famous "Great Mosque of Cordoba" was built over a Visigoth Church and it's no coincidence that the WTC Mosque is called "Cordoba House."
There's a kind of double speak ass-hattery going on here. In English the Imam behind Cordoba House is trumpeting lines of cultural exchange and tolerance, but in Arabic he's saying some very different things.
This, on websites that argue why Muslims should not sell property to Christians who want to build a church nonetheless.
This is the first I've heard of it, for one...tzor wrote: Why aren't you all equally upset about a decision not to have a Mosque on Staten Island? Now I can see the outrage there. But no one is. Why?
totallyNight Strike wrote:Great analysis GabonX.